Over the hedge hammy

Over the hedge hammy hyper

User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15, 000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads. Renewing Unemployment AFTER ending a Temp Job? Could REALLY use some help here! I m trying to get a solid grasp on just what might happen to my UI claims if I am eligible for UI again after I end some temp jobs. I would REALLY REALLY REALLY appreciate any feedback to give me some piece of mind here! My benefit year over the hedge hammy hyper on May 16th 20 Based on last years Quarterly High Benefit Rate I maxed out my WBR potential and was making 363 a week on UI. Unless the lame duck congress performs a MIRACLE and extends the EB program before the end of NOV, I m SOL because my 26 weeks ends on Nov 27th, thus making me a WEEK LATE to continue on to tier So in other words, I have no choice but to find over the hedge hammy hyper work I can get NOW. I don t have any latitude to try and ride it out and hope that an extension comes. I HAVE TO find work to survive. This means seasonal part time jobs because they are hiring NOW. I already have one that I m starting next week, I m looking for a second one too. So with respect to some of the threads that I have read on here, I am trying to clarify just how likely it is that I would be assigned a New Benefit Year if I go back on UI in the event that neither company keeps me on after the holidays. A If you are eligible for EB at that point the state will pay you a WBR reflective of your original Benefit Year until EB is exhausted. Then you go to the New Benefit Year if you are still eligible to collect UI. B I think more or less declares what A said? C You would receive the WBR rate untitled under the New Benefit Year AND an additional amount as provided by EUC that would EQUAL your old WBR in total. ie the old WBR was The new WBR rate is 125 so I would get 125 from the normal EUC, and an additional 238 from the EB fund. D???? This doesn t make any sense to me. Maybe they mean if you don t claim UI under the New Benefit Year then it is at their discretion to give you the EUC rate? if you appeal that the New Benefit Year is to low and you don t bother to claim any more and they decide if you can get back on UI with the EUC rate instead? And that brings me to what I read in the Don t Get a Temporary Job! Thread about what constitutes as qualifying for a New Benefit Year. So that according to that formula if I make over 8 X my WBA of 363 that equals 2, 904 and I will easily exceed that, even on 1 part time job in a single quarter. In other words, it sounds as if I m going to be on a New Benefit Year. I will qualify for the wage requirement easily in 2 months time, but I really DON T want to be on the New Benefit Year rate. If anyone can give me some insight as to whether or not I am correct on those assumptions I have made, or if they have faced similar situations I would GREATLY appreciate your feedback! I m having a hard time facing the reality of closing off my potential to get back on unemployment period at this time, considering that I will have to work TWO minimum wage jobs 25 in WI at an average of 25 hrs a week just to EQUAL my former WBA. I m not being lazy, I just don t like the idea of working my off for LESS. Not to mention that if I do find a decent paying job making 15 or greater then leaving that to pursue my old career field seems risky and foolish until the economy recovers. I had been strongly considering taking a 4 week comprehensive software training class for high end engineering software. It would build upon my present skills and past experience as an Industrial Designer and also give me a good chance of finding a 6 month or 1 year contract job as a CAD Drafter. Which probably wouldnt have benefits or vac. time, but at least I could stand to make over 20 an hour from that. I would likely have made that my new career path vs.

  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a comment